We Are the World

Over the past few weeks, it is easy to get caught up in all the tragedy and struggles of the world and be at dismay. It is easy to feel hopelessness for humanity and it is easy to feel guilt and sadness. Once reading Beverly Bell's Fault Lines and seeing the Haiti aftermath documentary, I felt nauseous that there are people living in such health hazards and disgusting conditions. The earthquake struck Haiti six years ago. SIX years have passed and there are still people starving and living under tarps without running water.

As an American, every day I see new unnecessary construction, people making unnecessary purchases, and indulging in unnecessary luxuries and goods. After reading Bell's descriptions of life in Haiti after the earthquake and better yet putting a visual image to the catastrophe after watching the documentary in class, I have a new sickness in my stomach that we are oppressing our world's hurt and struggles. Just because these problems are not directly affecting us, we are not doing anything to help it.

Throughout finding the world's harsh realities every day, I continue to ask myself: what can I do? How can I make a difference in the lives of people who need me like the people reaping the consequences of natural disaster in Haiti? The only answer I can seem to find is that I cannot do it alone. No one can do it alone. Together, we need to unite to help our fellow humans in need. We cannot continue to oppress reality and the struggles of our peers in Haiti. WE are the world and WE are the children. Together, we can accomplish anything.

The funds that are not being accessible in Haiti need to be investigated.

New shelter needs to be provided and tent drives need to be help. We do fundraisers all the time for our own good, why can't we do it for others' good? Something needs to be done for these people in their time of need. When Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, together as a nation we stood to meet their needs. The people of Haiti do not have this kind of assistance and we need to be of that assistance.

From thousands of miles away, I feel the hurt of these people. I want to help and I can.
What can you do to make a difference?

Haiti's Gift Economy

"The same solidarity and gift economy is what has kept this resourceful people alive for centuries" (Bell, 21). To me, this quote rings true as a common theme for Haiti and shows just how strong the people are.

The Haitian Revolution was the only slave uprising that ended in a free state that was ruled by former slaves and not their captives. This uprising rocked many Western people's worlds because they believed in the myth that slaves were "happy" and "took pride in their work" which is why they would do it for free. The organization and ability to work cohesively under pressure is was what made the difference between life away from the French, or a slow death under their oppression. And the same cohesion and organization is what helped them endure life after the earthquake.

While reading Fault Lines I was overwhelmed by the amounts of community that showed through especially in the minutes, hours, and days directly after the earthquake. Bell talks about how there was essentially no government the second after the ground started to shake, and after that it was up to the citizens to take care of each other and their country. The stories and stories of people with cars that are miraculously still running that people volunteer to use so they could rush people to the makeshift hospital, and people sharing their last piece of bread so that someone else can eat truly makes my heart warm. But Bell also states that tragedy is when the opportunists come out and many times the people without a voice are taken advantage of by anyone from petty theives to organizations that are meant to help with disaster relief ended up not coming through. According to the Borgen Project only half the money foreign governments promised to pay has been paid, and half of the money American donors have spent on relief hasn't been spent and is instead being kept by the Red Cross as "long term projects". From private donations alone that's about 150 million dollars unspent to help the Haitian people. Because so many of the Haitian's own resources have been spent on relief, they are having a hard time getting back on their feet because recovery seems never ending.

Because Haiti was so impoverished before the earthquake and is predominantly black I do have to wonder if the foreign relief is slower because they aren't a "built up", white, wealthy society. If that's the case then I am ashamed to be a part of a system that places a hierarchy on human life, when death this long after the disaster could be so easily preventable.

Economics Effect on the Natural Balance of Life

Late posts are kind of becoming a thing for my section which I apologize for, but better late then never seems to cover my bases on that. Recently in class we covered the issue in video format of the economic struggle and prosperity of the Jamaican island. This brought my thinking to a level of economics and the effects it has on the physical and mental well being of the inhabitants. The thought is that importing and exporting is how many countries turn a profit for their cash crops and specialty commodities. Consider the clothing that many of us wear, along with a great portion of the goods that we use, many of them have a tag that reads "made in China", or "made in Taiwan". Now imagine the amount of other countries that use the wholesale value of the production of goods made in countries like those, then just take it all away. This would mean that all goods purchased in the country would be made from within the boundaries of said country, the cost of production to consumer would be around the same. Cost effectivity would plummet and many economies would struggle to stay afloat as the range of production to retail cost would not be as broad, meaning that the profit margin would be dramatically reduced causing stocks and abridge the gap between wealthy and well off. In Jamaica the production of American goods which technically never touchs ground on Jamaican soil and are produced in the "free zone" manufactured for minimal pay. The workers will make around $1,500 Jamaican dollars per paycheck, which is the equivalent of $30 U.S. dollars. The range of exchange for the compensation of work brings costs for the U.S. goods down while the average price of these is 60-70% more than what it took to produce them, leaving a giant profit margin for the company that has their brand written on them. How does this effect those who are actually making these goods and getting paid dirt for it? Whether men or woman it seems that the knowledge that all of those long days comprised of hard work and long hours, is going towards barley paying the bills as is can cause much stress to build up inside of someone. For instance my job pays well but nearing the end of a paycheck, I start to have tidbits of stress due to the fact I do not know how to spread the money to fit it all. Bills, Gas, food, and other daily necessities must come first. The question is which one needs to be given the most attention and safety. Now add a family to that equation and life has just sprouted horns and started to laugh in your face it seems.

The economic welfare of many major countries has seemed to compromise the import and export of others, and when the number one option becomes obsolete then tourists will pay the bills. We discussed the happy nature that many residents of Caribbean countries have as shown in commercials and such, yet most locals in these resort areas will warn you to not leave the resort area un-supervised as it is very dangerous for tourists to venture as they are either not well accepted by the locals, or are seen as easy targets for theft. When I went to Cabo for spring break last year, my friends and I got off the flight and while on the shuttle to the resort we were told that the locals do not take kindly to our kind as we Americans are viewed as very pompous and self-centered in demeanor. As well as pictured as over privileged "gringo" rich people. The exchange rates in this country are usually very high favoring the U.S. currency. meaning many who seem to make a decent wage in their nations currency are making less than the minimum wage here state side.

This past week, we’ve talked about neoliberalism and the global political economy. And after reading Jamaica Kincaid’s book, A Small Place and watching the film Life and Debt, I’ve learned one thing to be true: Power is everything. Before I get too far into any discussion I want to lay out a few definitions that were new to me…

Neoliberalism: The rule of the market- also the heart of capitalism. It has a great deal to do with Reagan’s theory of “trickle down economics.” It states that the best way to increase economic growth and to benefit all people is to have a completely unregulated market- free of government intervention.

Global political economy: brings together systems of power and basic economics (means of production, profit and the movement of capital). Basically it looks at the economy and investigates further the forces driving it and the motives behind those forces.

In class, Dr. Shoaff briefly mentioned the idea of metaphorical free zones- this thought really resonated with me. I like to think that I’ve had some great family vacations- most of which led us out to beaches out of the country. Our tour guide through the rain forest of Puerto Rico was great! As was our snorkeling instructor in Belize and the staff of our resort in the Bahamas. I fell into the trap of ignoring my privilege. My privilege permits ignorance. “And it will never occur to you that the people who inhabit this place in which you have just paused cannot stand you” (Kincaid, 17). It never occurred to me that my visits to these countries were simply touchdowns to a free zone. The only time we would leave the resort was on an excursion planned by said resort.

Now lets talk about free zones…

In the film Life and Debt that we watched in class, they interviewed individuals that work in free zones in Jamaica. Nothing seemed fair about their situation to me. (Which again goes back into the idea that not everyone starts on an even playing field and that fair does not really exist when it comes to class, but that’s a post for another day). I felt for them, $30 every two weeks? And their paychecks aren’t promised to come in on time? How awful. And although it is difficult to do, we need to force ourselves to think about the politics of it all. Who is exploited who here, and for what reason? It’s us. My dad wears Brooks Brothers on special occasion; I’ve shopped at Tommy Hilfiger. Because of my privilege, I am oblivious to the thought of the labor put into sewing those clothes together. Its sickening to think about really. And I think Kincaid’s book made a lot of us feel uncomfortable for the sake of enlightening us- forcing us to think about the politics behind this global economy that we support.

Immigration Bill Hb 56: Polarizing Views In Legislation

Article on the Daily Caller: "Alabama's Toughest Immigration Law Didn't Fail- It was Gutted"

     After learning about Alabama's anti-immigration bill, HB 56, that was passed in 2011, from the article titled: "Alabama's Shame: HB 56 and the War on Immigrants," I decided to do some further investigation. The bill's intent was suppose to make life so unlivable for undocumented immigrants that they would self-deport. The 'Alabama Shame' article reveals that the bill's provisions not only made it legal for police to ask for people's "papers" to demonstrate citizenship or legal status and prevented undocumented immigrants from receiving access to medical aid at hospitals/urgent cares. It also (as the stories in the article report) prevented undocumented immigrants from having access to business permits, prevented access to running water in the homes of undocumented immigrants, rendered contracts with illegal immigrants invalid, etc. It essentially punished the illegal immigrants who were attracted to big businesses' cheap wages without punishing big businesses for hiring them. The "Alabama Shame" article showed many examples of how the bill allowed many businessmen to actually take advantage of illegal immigrant and commit further crime by not giving due process rights to illegals when business did not pay them deserved wages or even repo-ed vehicles after undocumented people already had paid for them. When the undocumented can't turn to the police when they are being victimized, bad people will take advantage of that vulnerability.

     I needed to read more about all the sides of this article before I could better understand the bill's purpose, intents, and impact. The video above is a short 1:50 minute interview with Alabama's first African-American federal judge, retired Judge UW Clemon. He talks about how the bill has resulted in a civil rights crisis due to the fact that the bill has consequentially used racial profiling to essentially drive not only undocumented latinos out of the state, but has resulted in essentially driving all latinos (even citizen and legally documented) out of the state. Clemon compares it to the Jim Crow segregation period that blacks faced. In the state of Alabama, because of HB 56, if you are of hispanic nationality: the color of your skin means being racially profiled by the police, being pulled over at a higher rate in an attempt to catch undocumented immigrants, and having to verify your citizenship on a regular basis just because of your skin tone. That is harassment. That is discriminatory, and yet many people in Alabama have stood behind this bill. 

     I questioned how proponents of the HB 56 bill saw this discrimination, and what I realized is that they didn't. I began to google articles written by proponents of HB 56. At the top of this blog is an article by the Daily Caller, a Conservative news source. The article talks about how the bill didn't fail on its own, but that the Federal Government dismantled it. Apparently there was many predictions made about how pushing out illegal immigrants of Alabama would actually hurt the economy (similar to what we've talked about in class). The article spends its entirety trying to disprove any negative predictions made about the bill, but never once addresses the civil rights issue of the bill. Author Scott Greer of the article "Alabama's Toughest Immigration Bill Didn't Fail-It was Gutted" never once takes in to major consideration that a immigration reform bill shouldn't exist operating on racial profiling and discrimination and that in doing so it violates constitutional rights and that that is enough of a reason for it not to be legal. It's interesting that Greer never once takes in to consideration how the bill could be a civil rights violation for any hispanic citizen who fears increased traffic stops because of racial profiling and having to always keep documents on them to verify legal status. But I guess this has always been the struggle for people of color in America, and this has always been the privileged opinions of many whites in America because apparently somehow people around the US, in places like Alabama, think what has gone on is okay. The disconnect is startling and sad. 

This week is coming to a close and I am frankly disgusted with the decisions of our country after seeing Donald Trump as a top candidate for our presidential election. Which leads me to one of the most ignorant comments (of many) he has ever made: that immigrants are DRUGLORDS, RAPIST, and CRIMINALS. This is putting a false identity on other minorities and another form of oppresion by Americans. This profiling is not healthy and is keeping people of other cultures from fully living their life here in the "land of the free".

Just like in the 9500 Liberty Film, racial profiling is very much an issue in our country. People of any color were likely to get in trouble with law enforcement for no other probable cause other than the color of their skin. Not only is this extremely racist and ignorant, it is very much ILLEGAL. Why is law enforcement getting away with this? I remember even in the ferguson film that they said the police even had marked amounts of the profit they were going to be making by increasing the number of people they pull over (which was mostly minorities).

In the 9500 Liberty film, the council members could see how the immigrants were great members of the community. Most of them agreed that they were hard workers and very family oriented, just like most of themselves and that they could fit right in. They were thankful -- while other council members argued to just "put them in a box and take them out".

This is just so sad to think about. Immigrants are here to just like we are to live in freedom and away from poverty, but instead they are just getting harrassed. These false idenifications about immigrants are hurting people who were already hurting. It was just a really harsh reality to see how unfair life can be for reasons that are so out of control.

Not Everyone is Welcome to All Safe Places

"Maybe this song isn't for us" a terrified Bobby Moynihan exclaims, "but everything usually is!" Cecily Strong replies. By now I'm sure that most of us have already seen Beyonce's new video and Super Bowl performance of Formation. After her performance the talks surrounding her song ranged from confused and uncomfortable, to empowered and recognized, and I think that these discussions are showing how incredibly important it is to have a space, a song, an anything that are for marginalized groups only. 

While I think that allies are a very important aspect in any organization and can really help share the load, I think that knowing when to take a back seat and not take part is extremely important as well. "Any group whether organized around a shared marginalized identity or not, will by-default be centered around the most powerful in that group"(Kyra). Because of this, white people are used to being in power and when they have to give up this power, then they feel that they are being left out, and not included. However, like we talked about in class, when diverse groups get together, it can often turn into an oppression olympics, and one problem often gets overshadowed by hundreds of other problems, which essentially makes sure that nothing gets done. Along with this power stance, the inclusion of white allies into non-white spaces upholds white supremacy. Because white people are so often in power, they get to choose what is appropriate in that space and what isn't, which essentially white washes the group and strips it of its diversity. Take the video for example, when the woman is yelling "we have to go, we have to leave America, Beyonce is black", to which the woman she's talking to responds "Amy, I'm black". Amy seems shocked and confused but when her friend points to a man wearing a flat billed hat and a large pendant necklace she responds "well I know he's black". This just goes to show how colorblindness hurts us, but also how the person in power (Amy) gets to choose what is appropriate (her friend dressed in a similar outfit to the rest of the crowd), and what is not (the man dressed in the flat billed hat and pendant). 

While most feminist spaces pride themselves on being "inclusive" and "diverse", there also needs to be spaces that can be for marginalized groups only to come together and discuss issues without feeling overshadowed. When starting this post I was trying to find a video that talked about safe spaces and instead found pages and pages of videos talking about how safe spaces are useless and completely pointless, mostly made by white men. So my question for you is do you think that safe spaces are important? And is it ok to exclude people from certain spaces? 

I want to start by saying this post is going to a million directions because so is my brain, here it goes:

Let’s see about the “American Dream.” Growing up, I’ve always been taught that by working hard, you can accomplish anything. Coates does a wonderful job of pointing out in “Between the world and me” that life is anything but an even playing field. (As did the Ferguson documentary we watched in class on Thursday). We need to squash the myth that is the American Dream, because it is the exception not the rule. (Yes that was a He’s Just Not That Into You reference). But the concept of it is prevalent. We listen to stories of people finding their soul mate at a bar, while all my friends have never met anyone worth mentioning. But we romanticize the idea that the possibility is out there, “if so-and-so met him, I could too.” Paralleling that, while there are, no doubt, people who started with nothing and made something out of it- this is a rarity. American politics have made it close to impossible to break out of the class that you are born into. Politics equals power and the powerful call the shots.

Segway to the amount of power police have in our nation…

“The truth is that the police reflect America in all of its will and fear, and whatever we might make of this country’s criminal justice policy, it cannot be said that it was imposed by a repressive minority” (Coates 77). After viewing the Ferguson documentary in class, I really started to wonder just how much power should be entrusted to the police. In class we discussed the discussion that many black parents engage their children in, to protect themselves from seemingly inevitable police brutality. My discussions with my parents went just ever-so-slightly different: “police are there to help you” … “if you are ever in an emergency find a police officer” … “if you are pulled over, use ‘yes mam’ or ‘yes sir’ and you will be fine.” I trusted my high school’s resource officer. Coates speaks for those that do not have this luxury. Instead when they are shot and killed for selling a carton of cigarettes, or for no reason whatsoever, they are met with criticism. Even I’ve fallen into the trap of “they should have regarded the officers with more respect, if they had only complied maybe the outcome would have been different.” I am ashamed of this type of thinking because it is almost as if it was programmed into me. I have been taught that by simply showing some respect, you will be able to maneuver a bad situation involving police- but this isn’t the case.

“’White America’ is a syndicate arrayed to protect its exclusive power to dominate and control our bodies. Sometimes this power is direct (lynching), and sometimes it is insidious (redlining). But however it appears, the power of domination and exclusion is central to the belief in being white, and without it, “white people” would cease to exist for want of reason” (Coates, 40). I found this to be extremely powerful. Especially after talking in class about how far back this oppression traces. One thing from the film in class that stuck out to me was the man who said he already knew the outcome of Michael Brown’s case. It reminded me of Emmett Till’s mother, who left the court before the verdict was read- because she knew what the outcome would be. There is no justice for blacks in America- there never really has been.

Leaders of the personal Agenda

This post is really late and i am sorry. looking into last weeks tour of the campus was something that needed to sink in. The concept of most of the stops I had already learned about many of these stops through my freshman composition class. Yet the detailed information that was defined was well liberating. The fact of not knowing of these on my tour and information sessions nothing of these sorts was talked of nor hinted at. Many campus's around the country and the south were built by slave labor which most people see as shocking, yet are cornered into the concept of geographical location by time period. this for many reasons can be seen as excusable. Yes time and place do play a factor as in politics do play a large role in the advancement of situations. The ideals of one who have the power can have an effect on the opinion of many. As we had discussed in lecture the concept of " the one who controls the present, controls the past" the explanation is that those who control the system now can manipulate the effects that past historical events play within the realm of the lives of those who play the role of new generations.  This is why I believe that the facts of these historical locations and events that took place have been in a sense "covered up". These notable events if expressed during such events as campus tours could take cause a mass decrease in the enrollment rate at the university.

By divulging the information of these historical hatred it may have put the future of enrollment rates, out of state enrollment, and eclectic mix that has graced this great university as a whole. Over my last 4 years attending The University of Alabama there have been many aspect that have put faith and morals in question, both personal and universal. Yet there has been progress in which has shaped every moment of my tenure at this great historic college. The institution of diversity has been well on its way to inclusion of all. "They always say time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself"- Andy Warhol. This quote my mother told me inspired the ideals that it is not the popular opinion of many does it take to change the world, but the outspoken thoughts and drive that one may have to take an the stance against that popular opinion and want to make a change that challenges the system of the present day leaders who "control the past". 

Culturally Defined..

"If slaves could fool white senses, what were masters to do? Some found answers in relying on noses better than theirs. Hound dogs that tracked slave runaways were extensions of the master's nose, enabling him to continue surveillance out of sight. Slaves thought dogs could smell "nigger blood" and so developed strategies to fool masters' sensory aids. Sensory evasion mostly involved fooling canine noises, using "remedies" so that "the hounds could not scent them, so they could not be trailed" even "within five feet." (How Race is Made, Chapter 2, pg.35)

The senses include seeing, hearing, smelling, touching, and tasting. When we talk and think about the senses we imagine delicious foods, sweet smells, soft fabrics, or noises that peak our interest. When I think of the senses nowhere in my thinking do I imagine having to rely on my sense of smell to live, I cannot imagine having to use my sense of sight to be aware of the way people’s mood change to make sure I stay out of harm’s way. The excerpt that I have above in so many words shows the impact that slavery had on these people. The culture of these people was so entrapped and laced with fear. Their culture was doing whatever they could to stay on master’s good side so that they could complete the tasks asked and expected of them.
 This week we continued the discussion of culture. We talked about what we thought culture was. I remember a student in our class stating that culture is fluid and ever-changing. the definition of culture that I found is "A culture is a way of life of a group of people--the behaviors, beliefs, values, and symbols that they accept, generally without thinking about them, and that are passed along by communication and imitation from one generation to the next." My culture is who i am and it defines me. Did slavery define the enslaved. Do you think that their harsh reality and culture shaped their personalities or the relationships witheach other? What do you believe your culture has specifically done to make you who you are today?

-Deayana

Patricia Arquette and Emma Watson Are White Feminists and That's Okay to Say

     Patricia Hill Collins in her piece "Toward A New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender As Categories of Analysis and Connection" relays a very important message that I think youtube user 'Marinashutup' illustrates perfectly in the video above. Collins points out that people often look at the oppression most serious to them and ignore all the others they are experiencing or that exist in the world, (Collins, 1). As we talked about in class, this has led to an either/or approach to viewing people's identities. You are either a man or a woman. White or a person of color. Gay or straight. This type of mentality denies the fact that there are many people out there facing intersecting oppressions due to multiple parts of their identity. It also has prevented unity in the women's movement. As Marinashutup points out, historically mainstream feminism has taken a 'one size fits all approach' to viewing women's issues. This has resulted in a clash between white women and women of color, disabled women, LBTQ+ women, etc because white women do not face the added oppressions that those other subgroups experience and often fail to acknowledge that privilege. When mainstream feminism does not acknowledge these subgroups experiences in the movement this results in these other subgroups finding feminism inaccessible. It slows progression for the movement as a whole.

      I think it's important to acknowledge that there has been an increase in sensitivity towards this problem in the women's movement, but as Marinashutup points out, there is a lot of room to improve. Her critique of Patricia Arquette and Emma Watson's acceptance speeches have caused people to be angry. Many people feel that any attempt to bring feminist issues into the light of mainstream media, even if they fail to acknowledge the issues of women of color, should be applauded; that any attention is good attention. This type of mentality as Marinashutup points out, basically tells women of color, like herself, to sit down and shut up and take what you can get. It marginalizes an already marginalized group. It also reaffirms the either/or mentality: that women's issues and racial issues are entirely separate. 

     One of my favorite points that this vlogger points out is how tied separate oppressions can be. Her example of Kimberly Crenshaw, the originator of the term 'intersectionality,' perfectly highlights the nuanced struggle of belonging to multiple oppressed groups at the same time. According to Marinashutup, Kimberly Crenshaw has spoken out about being a black women and states she often felt that she had to pick one part of her identity over the other at a time. She was either a person of color or a woman. As Marinashutup states, "This ignores the reality that the sexism that women of color face are often racialized and the racism they often face is often sexualized." People often ignore the fact that other forms of oppression come into play when experiencing sexism and vice versa. As the video points out, we all often like to focus on our commonalities but its obviously important to recognize our differences, too, when trying to understand each other. Mainstream feminism needs to be more encompassing of our differences to see greater unity among us.